Constitutional Failure: Carl Schmitt in Weimar
Kennedy reveals how Schmitt€s argument for a strong but neutral state supported the maximization of market freedom at the cost of the political constitution. She argues that the major fault lines of Weimar liberalism€"emergency powers, the courts as €œdefenders of the constitution,€ mass mobilization of anti-liberal politics, ethnic-identity politics, a culture of resentment and contested legitimacy€"are not exceptions within the liberal-democratic orders of the West, but central to them. Contending that Schmitt€s thought remains vital today because liberal norms are inadequate to the political challenges facing constitutional systems as diverse as those of Eastern Europe and the United States, Kennedy develops a compelling, rigorous argument that unsettles many assumptions about liberalism, democracy, and dictatorship.